The universities say race is just one factor that is considered as part of broad individualized analysis of each applicant. NBA News - Latest team, player and league news NBA.com Numbers to know from 3 offseason trades Will Chris Paul fit with the Warriors What about Bradley Beal in Phoenix Here are the key. In defending their policies, the universities and their supporters - including the Biden administration, civil rights groups, businesses and former military leaders - argued that excluding someone based on race is completely different from seeking diversity on campus. Every story from every site is brought to you automatically and continuously 24/7, within around 10 minutes of publication. In both cases, lower courts ruled in favor of the universities. NewsNow is the world's most accurate and comprehensive aggregator of USA news, covering the latest US current affairs, events and more from the best online news publications. US top court verdict: On colleges and race, Indian-American leaders split on. It said that the UNC admissions policy discriminates against white and Asian applicants and that the Harvard policy discriminates against Asians. World News - Find latest world news and headlines today based on politics.
Because Jackson served on Harvard’s Board of Overseers during the litigation, she stepped aside from the Harvard case and participated only in the North Carolina dispute.īlum’s group argued that any consideration of race in college admissions is unlawful under both Title VI and the Constitution. President Joe Biden’s appointment of Jackson did not change the ideological balance of the court, as she replaced fellow liberal Justice Stephen Breyer. The court shifted to the right after President Donald Trump appointed three conservative justices. In 2016, the last time the Supreme Court ruled on affirmative action, the justices narrowly upheld the admissions policy at the University of Texas at Austin on a 4-3 vote, with conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has since retired, casting the deciding vote. In doing so, the court scrapped decades of precedent, including a ruling dating to 1978, that upheld a limited consideration of race in university admissions to combat historic discrimination against Black people and other minority groups. Bollinger, in which it said race could be considered as a factor in the admissions process because universities had a compelling interest in maintaining diverse campuses. The court effectively overturned the 2003 ruling Grutter v. University of North Carolina students make their way across the campus in Chapel Hill on March 28. Find the latest regional business news pertaining to the United States of America including headlines & top.
#USA BREAKING NEWS NOW FOR FREE#
The WUSA9+ app is now available for free on most major streaming.
#USA BREAKING NEWS NOW DOWNLOAD#
President Joe Biden called the decision a " severe disappointment," adding that his administration would provide guidance about how colleges could maintain diversity without violating the ruling. Get complete CNBC business news coverage online. Download the WUSA9 News app on your mobile device to get personalized weather. "It wasn’t perfect, but there’s no doubt that it helped offer new ladders of opportunity for those who, throughout our history, have too often been denied a chance to show how fast they can climb," said Michelle Obama, the first Black first lady. If (slot) slot.addService(googletag.The decision was hailed by prominent conservatives, who say the Constitution should be "colorblind," with former President Donald Trump calling i t "a great day for America." Liberals, however, condemned the ruling, saying affirmative action is a key tool for remedying historic race discrimination. (function (a, d, o, r, i, c, u, p, w, m)
0 kommentar(er)
